<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Learn How To Avoid Private Investigators &#8211; Followed By A Private Investigator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.howtovanish.com/2009/08/avoid-private-investigators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.howtovanish.com/2009/08/avoid-private-investigators/</link>
	<description>Learn how to protect your personal and financial privacy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:54:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghani</title>
		<link>http://www.howtovanish.com/2009/08/avoid-private-investigators/comment-page-1/#comment-1747</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 20:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtovanish.com/?p=224#comment-1747</guid>
		<description>@David: 
I&#039;m very appreciative for your comment, as I am in the beginning stages of obtaining my license in Florida for private investigation.  I&#039;m also not surprised by the amount of hostility toward the investigation industry, as I have come into contact with some very &quot;slimy&quot; investigators who, although few, give everyone a bad name.  Our role in the field is to document a subject in their natural environment, not to create a situation or exaggerate the findings.  Those who are injured are not the issue, and should not be offended or defensive of the investigation into their claim.  The unfortunate truth is that not everyone is as honest as some of the commentors here claim to be, and we all pay for the behavior of those fraudsters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David:<br />
I&#8217;m very appreciative for your comment, as I am in the beginning stages of obtaining my license in Florida for private investigation.  I&#8217;m also not surprised by the amount of hostility toward the investigation industry, as I have come into contact with some very &#8220;slimy&#8221; investigators who, although few, give everyone a bad name.  Our role in the field is to document a subject in their natural environment, not to create a situation or exaggerate the findings.  Those who are injured are not the issue, and should not be offended or defensive of the investigation into their claim.  The unfortunate truth is that not everyone is as honest as some of the commentors here claim to be, and we all pay for the behavior of those fraudsters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david hahn</title>
		<link>http://www.howtovanish.com/2009/08/avoid-private-investigators/comment-page-1/#comment-1695</link>
		<dc:creator>david hahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtovanish.com/?p=224#comment-1695</guid>
		<description>my $.02 - the insurance company is trying to mitigate their loss, in the same way that the injured &amp; their representation is trying to maximize their compensation.  I manage a litigation support firm, and can assure you that, when running a surveillance operation, we are only there to document the truth, not create situations that embarrass or discredit the injured party.  If the most I see you doing is sitting on the porchswing or doing some light grocery shopping, I can assure you that carting a gallon of milk around isn&#039;t going to hurt your case;  If you claim you can&#039;t squeeze or use your hands but I watch you hang from monkey bars for the 1/2 hour you&#039;re with your kid at the fast food restaurant playland, well, I think there are bigger issues than whether a &#039;snitch&#039; is watching you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my $.02 &#8211; the insurance company is trying to mitigate their loss, in the same way that the injured &amp; their representation is trying to maximize their compensation.  I manage a litigation support firm, and can assure you that, when running a surveillance operation, we are only there to document the truth, not create situations that embarrass or discredit the injured party.  If the most I see you doing is sitting on the porchswing or doing some light grocery shopping, I can assure you that carting a gallon of milk around isn&#8217;t going to hurt your case;  If you claim you can&#8217;t squeeze or use your hands but I watch you hang from monkey bars for the 1/2 hour you&#8217;re with your kid at the fast food restaurant playland, well, I think there are bigger issues than whether a &#8216;snitch&#8217; is watching you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.howtovanish.com/2009/08/avoid-private-investigators/comment-page-1/#comment-1373</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtovanish.com/?p=224#comment-1373</guid>
		<description>P.S. One more thing Earl, and to anyone else who buys into the propaganda whines of wc insurers: When the injured workers pay is reduced every week upwards of FORTY PERCENT ( and forty percent of generally low-wage/blue collar jobs is...? right...even lower ), the injured workers BILLS ARE NOT REDUCED. The power company doesn&#039;t reduced the bills 40%, the water company doesn&#039;t reduce the bills 40%, their food bills aren&#039;t reduced 40%, their childrens and pets medical needs are not reduced 40%, fuel aka &#039;gas&#039; is not reduced 40%, their auto insurance is not reduced 40%...do you get it yet Earl? Come on now, you can handle a little TRUTH can&#039;t you Earl? 

Every citizen in this country enjoys the right to choose their own medical provider Earl EXCEPT the injured worker. To choose their own doctor to look after the injuries INCURRED AT WORK, means either a) paying the bills themselves which they cannot afford to do and often don&#039;t have the medical insurance via their jobs anymore because their greedy employers FIRE them, or find a flimsy excuse to fire them, FOR BEING INJURED or b) means fighting for months in a back and forth with a resistant &#039;defense&#039; to get their ONE-TIME option of choosing their own doctor, which does not happen for months, sometimes YEARS before they can. And that&#039;s IF they can, because it&#039;s no guarantee it will be approved.

See Earl, you and people like you really have NO idea just how caustic, cruel, and hostile the wc &#039;system&#039; is to injured workers. And PI&#039;s who work for the soulless insurers, mainly the nasty little adjustors assigned to the claim ( who, btw, have the sole job role of AVOIDING any kind of paying out - oh, you didn&#039;t think about that, huh? ), are just part of a game of psychological warfare on the injured workers. PI&#039;s are paid, primarily, as just another tool ( emphasis on TOOL ) to wear the injured workers down even further than their injuries or illness do. PI&#039;s are not honorable people. If they were, THEY&#039;D go get those jobs they think the injured workers should be hobbling and crawling to go get, no matter how much pain they&#039;re in. The jobs that do NOT require snitching and sniveling and skulking around on their own fellow citizens for. Real patriotic work that pee eye stuff huh? Snitching on your own brothers and sisters under this great countrys flag. Well done. Bravo. Real big of ya&#039; zero-hero.

Injured workers are NOT claims. They&#039;re human beings. Human beings who are used, broken, and tossed away. To say &#039;go be productive&#039; is an enormous display of just how ignorant and souless and sick you have to be to support the conspiracy of suspicion and guilt before innocence syndrome that the insurance industry RELIES on people like you checking their brains out to lunch for. Here&#039;s a challenge for you Earl, and I defy you to find the information. If you can, you&#039;d be the first but there&#039;s one little caveat to think about. A &#039;pre-question&#039; to the question, if you will: If you cannot find the information, ask yourself WHO would want it hidden?

Here&#039;s the question: Why can no one find the suicide rates/statistics/facts of injured workers? To make it easy on you Earl, let&#039;s rule out suicide &#039;attempts&#039;. You can find them for morticians, ER docs, airline pilots, air traffic control, etc etc. Hmmmm.....but where are the ones for injured workers? Gee, who would have that buried?

Follow the money Earl, follow the money...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. One more thing Earl, and to anyone else who buys into the propaganda whines of wc insurers: When the injured workers pay is reduced every week upwards of FORTY PERCENT ( and forty percent of generally low-wage/blue collar jobs is&#8230;? right&#8230;even lower ), the injured workers BILLS ARE NOT REDUCED. The power company doesn&#8217;t reduced the bills 40%, the water company doesn&#8217;t reduce the bills 40%, their food bills aren&#8217;t reduced 40%, their childrens and pets medical needs are not reduced 40%, fuel aka &#8216;gas&#8217; is not reduced 40%, their auto insurance is not reduced 40%&#8230;do you get it yet Earl? Come on now, you can handle a little TRUTH can&#8217;t you Earl? </p>
<p>Every citizen in this country enjoys the right to choose their own medical provider Earl EXCEPT the injured worker. To choose their own doctor to look after the injuries INCURRED AT WORK, means either a) paying the bills themselves which they cannot afford to do and often don&#8217;t have the medical insurance via their jobs anymore because their greedy employers FIRE them, or find a flimsy excuse to fire them, FOR BEING INJURED or b) means fighting for months in a back and forth with a resistant &#8216;defense&#8217; to get their ONE-TIME option of choosing their own doctor, which does not happen for months, sometimes YEARS before they can. And that&#8217;s IF they can, because it&#8217;s no guarantee it will be approved.</p>
<p>See Earl, you and people like you really have NO idea just how caustic, cruel, and hostile the wc &#8216;system&#8217; is to injured workers. And PI&#8217;s who work for the soulless insurers, mainly the nasty little adjustors assigned to the claim ( who, btw, have the sole job role of AVOIDING any kind of paying out &#8211; oh, you didn&#8217;t think about that, huh? ), are just part of a game of psychological warfare on the injured workers. PI&#8217;s are paid, primarily, as just another tool ( emphasis on TOOL ) to wear the injured workers down even further than their injuries or illness do. PI&#8217;s are not honorable people. If they were, THEY&#8217;D go get those jobs they think the injured workers should be hobbling and crawling to go get, no matter how much pain they&#8217;re in. The jobs that do NOT require snitching and sniveling and skulking around on their own fellow citizens for. Real patriotic work that pee eye stuff huh? Snitching on your own brothers and sisters under this great countrys flag. Well done. Bravo. Real big of ya&#8217; zero-hero.</p>
<p>Injured workers are NOT claims. They&#8217;re human beings. Human beings who are used, broken, and tossed away. To say &#8216;go be productive&#8217; is an enormous display of just how ignorant and souless and sick you have to be to support the conspiracy of suspicion and guilt before innocence syndrome that the insurance industry RELIES on people like you checking their brains out to lunch for. Here&#8217;s a challenge for you Earl, and I defy you to find the information. If you can, you&#8217;d be the first but there&#8217;s one little caveat to think about. A &#8216;pre-question&#8217; to the question, if you will: If you cannot find the information, ask yourself WHO would want it hidden?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the question: Why can no one find the suicide rates/statistics/facts of injured workers? To make it easy on you Earl, let&#8217;s rule out suicide &#8216;attempts&#8217;. You can find them for morticians, ER docs, airline pilots, air traffic control, etc etc. Hmmmm&#8230;..but where are the ones for injured workers? Gee, who would have that buried?</p>
<p>Follow the money Earl, follow the money&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.howtovanish.com/2009/08/avoid-private-investigators/comment-page-1/#comment-1372</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtovanish.com/?p=224#comment-1372</guid>
		<description>Your article on avoiding these insurance slaves ( aka &#039;snitches&#039; aka &#039;wannabe commandos&#039; aka &#039;failed cops&#039; aka &#039;slimy pink things that crawl out of a hole&#039; aka &#039;pry eyes&#039; ) is kind of good, but I think it could be greatly improved. For example, no mention is made of simply setting up a fake pattern, and then breaking it. Shampoo, rinse, repeat. The &#039;target&#039; can, for example, go for a ten minute drive every Tuesday at 3pm using the same roads and do this for one week. If during that time they notice the snoops are around or following, terrific. Break the pattern instantly you know they&#039;re on to it and start a new one. Also, if you believe you are being followed via car ( and following with only one car is extremely difficult as it&#039;s too easy to lose one car ), then simply perform what&#039;s called a &#039;box manuever&#039;. Take 4 consecutive right turns while driving. If someone takes 4 consec rights WITH you - even at a distance - the odds they are following you are astronomically high.

Also, purposely change your sleep patterns. Turn the lights off early at the same time every night for a week. Even pretend to sleep and use a nightlight to read. Next week, alter the light patterns in your room. The next week, get up with the dawn. Change how/when your exterior lights come on and off. One week always make sure all your window blinds are open. Whoopee! They might get a camera shot inside. Next week, keep &#039;em all closed. Start a pattern, break it. Start a route, change it. Point is, they&#039;re looking for patterns, places, people. Just keep setting the stage and then rearranging it over and over They hate that!

I do agree that the battery removal of the celly is a good idea but I&#039;d go one farther. I&#039;d take the SIM card out as well. You can store them in seperate baggies if you like. Place them in different areas that only you know of. Also, if you think they might be trying to hack your home network, NOW is the time to close that puppy up. And when you leave home, shut off the modem, the router, and power down your computer.

One thing I would&#039;ve liked to have seen: How To Find Hidden Micro-cameras ( which can now be wireless ) in your home. Also, anything about defeating illegal entry or figuring out if someone&#039;s jimmying those locks or not. The thing is, for wc claims you&#039;re often talking about people who just do NOT have the money to invest in counter-surveillance and frankly, simply can&#039;t physically handle installing ( and not everyone has an ideal situation of tons of friends to call on ). So, maybe something for those folks as well.

I read one story about a guy who found a wireless surveillance camera buried at the base of his tree in hopes of catching him doing kartwheels in the yard I guess. Boy the FUN I would&#039;ve had with that thing. Anyway, it&#039;s AT LEAST evidence that the jerk who placed it there was trespassing. Which is illegal. And no evidence gained illegally can be submitted as sub rosa evidence. Not to my knowledge anyway.

And Earl my dear, the VAST MAJORITY of injured workers ARE injured. Private eyes are a waste of money by the insurance company who SHOULD be using that money to help the injured worker get back to work OR get re-educated into another field OR, and here&#039;s an astounding idea, see GOOD doctors instead of being sent to insurance mills. In the last decade, less than 2% of all IW&#039;s have been proven to be fraudulent. SUSPICION is NOT proof. You types are used primarily for ONE reason...one that you do not like to admit to: YOU are being used simply to harass the IW. That&#039;s all. Know why? The court doesn&#039;t spend hours and hours looking at all your sub rosa. There&#039;s just no time to. Next, they also know it&#039;s coming from the &#039;defense&#039; side of things. The work comp system is EXTREMELY adversarial against injured workers, but people like you NEED to believe otherwise so you can feel better about what YOU do, not because you actually believe the sick and the injured are &#039;bad&#039; in some way. You tell yourself these things so you don&#039;t have to think about how many IW&#039;s are destroyed financially by insurance companies, how many families are torn apart, how many children will go hungry, how the injured workers body is often permanently reduced, how the careers they spent their whole lives learning to do, how the experience and time they gave to their companies, and how their personal pride is utterly and totally devestated. Put THOSE facts in your lopside brain and see if it can&#039;t equalize back to normal for a second. There is no &#039;gold&#039; and there is no &#039;rainbow&#039; for injured workers. They are often injured and then fired and the companies get away with it and all with the help of people LIKE YOU.
They are bankrupted while they try to heal and recover physically and MANY of them can&#039;t because they are permanently disabled and often THAT is due to the failure of recieving proper medical treatment at the onset of injury, other times merely to the accident itself. But shill doctors certainly do not help buddy boy. The IW has NO choice during the intial phase of injury about which doctor they can go to. Your assumptions are not based on fact, they are based on a very powerful and wildly profitable insurance industry, often highly unregulated compared to other underwriting fields, who has the money to spend on decades of PROPOGANDA and lobbyists. Injured workers do NOT have high powered, spoiled, and rich lobbyists representing their interests as the insurers do and have had. Their attorneys salaries are CAPPED by the state whereas the &#039;defense&#039; attorney rep&#039;ing the employer can demand ANY salary and they are usually 3x more expensive than any injured worker could ever hope to afford. Hey Earl, time for another brain straightener: Ever heard the term,&quot;Follow the money&quot; to indicate where the truth REALLY is? OK, now think real hard Earl....WHO makes more money in one year: an injured worker whose salary is reduced nearly 40% per week or an insurance industry that pulls in BILLIONS every year? 

Here&#039;s some more math Early my boy: Insurer X has 10 claimes. Insurer X hires a PI to snith on 10 claimants. Even if the professional snitch manages to twist out two seconds of video over MONTHS of surveillance that also manages to PROVE only one claim in the 10 is fraudulent, that means the insurer has to pay out on 9 claimes. Guess what? Even paying out on 9 claimes, the insurer is STILL AHEAD.

Don&#039;t you get it? Or did watching Rockford re-runs and all those dinnertime news stories of the injured back guy digging a pool with a shovel ACTUALLY program you effectively enough to believe the drool that spilled from your brain, to your fingers, to your keyboard, and on to here?

Geezus man, do some research would ya? You&#039;re embarassing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article on avoiding these insurance slaves ( aka &#8216;snitches&#8217; aka &#8216;wannabe commandos&#8217; aka &#8216;failed cops&#8217; aka &#8216;slimy pink things that crawl out of a hole&#8217; aka &#8216;pry eyes&#8217; ) is kind of good, but I think it could be greatly improved. For example, no mention is made of simply setting up a fake pattern, and then breaking it. Shampoo, rinse, repeat. The &#8216;target&#8217; can, for example, go for a ten minute drive every Tuesday at 3pm using the same roads and do this for one week. If during that time they notice the snoops are around or following, terrific. Break the pattern instantly you know they&#8217;re on to it and start a new one. Also, if you believe you are being followed via car ( and following with only one car is extremely difficult as it&#8217;s too easy to lose one car ), then simply perform what&#8217;s called a &#8216;box manuever&#8217;. Take 4 consecutive right turns while driving. If someone takes 4 consec rights WITH you &#8211; even at a distance &#8211; the odds they are following you are astronomically high.</p>
<p>Also, purposely change your sleep patterns. Turn the lights off early at the same time every night for a week. Even pretend to sleep and use a nightlight to read. Next week, alter the light patterns in your room. The next week, get up with the dawn. Change how/when your exterior lights come on and off. One week always make sure all your window blinds are open. Whoopee! They might get a camera shot inside. Next week, keep &#8216;em all closed. Start a pattern, break it. Start a route, change it. Point is, they&#8217;re looking for patterns, places, people. Just keep setting the stage and then rearranging it over and over They hate that!</p>
<p>I do agree that the battery removal of the celly is a good idea but I&#8217;d go one farther. I&#8217;d take the SIM card out as well. You can store them in seperate baggies if you like. Place them in different areas that only you know of. Also, if you think they might be trying to hack your home network, NOW is the time to close that puppy up. And when you leave home, shut off the modem, the router, and power down your computer.</p>
<p>One thing I would&#8217;ve liked to have seen: How To Find Hidden Micro-cameras ( which can now be wireless ) in your home. Also, anything about defeating illegal entry or figuring out if someone&#8217;s jimmying those locks or not. The thing is, for wc claims you&#8217;re often talking about people who just do NOT have the money to invest in counter-surveillance and frankly, simply can&#8217;t physically handle installing ( and not everyone has an ideal situation of tons of friends to call on ). So, maybe something for those folks as well.</p>
<p>I read one story about a guy who found a wireless surveillance camera buried at the base of his tree in hopes of catching him doing kartwheels in the yard I guess. Boy the FUN I would&#8217;ve had with that thing. Anyway, it&#8217;s AT LEAST evidence that the jerk who placed it there was trespassing. Which is illegal. And no evidence gained illegally can be submitted as sub rosa evidence. Not to my knowledge anyway.</p>
<p>And Earl my dear, the VAST MAJORITY of injured workers ARE injured. Private eyes are a waste of money by the insurance company who SHOULD be using that money to help the injured worker get back to work OR get re-educated into another field OR, and here&#8217;s an astounding idea, see GOOD doctors instead of being sent to insurance mills. In the last decade, less than 2% of all IW&#8217;s have been proven to be fraudulent. SUSPICION is NOT proof. You types are used primarily for ONE reason&#8230;one that you do not like to admit to: YOU are being used simply to harass the IW. That&#8217;s all. Know why? The court doesn&#8217;t spend hours and hours looking at all your sub rosa. There&#8217;s just no time to. Next, they also know it&#8217;s coming from the &#8216;defense&#8217; side of things. The work comp system is EXTREMELY adversarial against injured workers, but people like you NEED to believe otherwise so you can feel better about what YOU do, not because you actually believe the sick and the injured are &#8216;bad&#8217; in some way. You tell yourself these things so you don&#8217;t have to think about how many IW&#8217;s are destroyed financially by insurance companies, how many families are torn apart, how many children will go hungry, how the injured workers body is often permanently reduced, how the careers they spent their whole lives learning to do, how the experience and time they gave to their companies, and how their personal pride is utterly and totally devestated. Put THOSE facts in your lopside brain and see if it can&#8217;t equalize back to normal for a second. There is no &#8216;gold&#8217; and there is no &#8216;rainbow&#8217; for injured workers. They are often injured and then fired and the companies get away with it and all with the help of people LIKE YOU.<br />
They are bankrupted while they try to heal and recover physically and MANY of them can&#8217;t because they are permanently disabled and often THAT is due to the failure of recieving proper medical treatment at the onset of injury, other times merely to the accident itself. But shill doctors certainly do not help buddy boy. The IW has NO choice during the intial phase of injury about which doctor they can go to. Your assumptions are not based on fact, they are based on a very powerful and wildly profitable insurance industry, often highly unregulated compared to other underwriting fields, who has the money to spend on decades of PROPOGANDA and lobbyists. Injured workers do NOT have high powered, spoiled, and rich lobbyists representing their interests as the insurers do and have had. Their attorneys salaries are CAPPED by the state whereas the &#8216;defense&#8217; attorney rep&#8217;ing the employer can demand ANY salary and they are usually 3x more expensive than any injured worker could ever hope to afford. Hey Earl, time for another brain straightener: Ever heard the term,&#8221;Follow the money&#8221; to indicate where the truth REALLY is? OK, now think real hard Earl&#8230;.WHO makes more money in one year: an injured worker whose salary is reduced nearly 40% per week or an insurance industry that pulls in BILLIONS every year? </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s some more math Early my boy: Insurer X has 10 claimes. Insurer X hires a PI to snith on 10 claimants. Even if the professional snitch manages to twist out two seconds of video over MONTHS of surveillance that also manages to PROVE only one claim in the 10 is fraudulent, that means the insurer has to pay out on 9 claimes. Guess what? Even paying out on 9 claimes, the insurer is STILL AHEAD.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you get it? Or did watching Rockford re-runs and all those dinnertime news stories of the injured back guy digging a pool with a shovel ACTUALLY program you effectively enough to believe the drool that spilled from your brain, to your fingers, to your keyboard, and on to here?</p>
<p>Geezus man, do some research would ya? You&#8217;re embarassing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl</title>
		<link>http://www.howtovanish.com/2009/08/avoid-private-investigators/comment-page-1/#comment-1129</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 04:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtovanish.com/?p=224#comment-1129</guid>
		<description>Earl, get your head out of your #*$, the majority of injury claims are legit, but since people have and many people have filed fraudelant claims you speak as though most everyone does. Let me tell you something, I ve filed 3 legit work comp cases over the past 12 yrs and I ve been followed and never did they catch me doing anything because I was legit, but its not a cool feeling to know you&#039;re being watched and then try to explain to your kids that its ok and they don&#039;t need to worry that a stranger is following us. Another thing Earl, I tell everyone I know that if they sustain an injury at work they better file a work comp claim otherwise they will most likely get screwed with their personal insurance, becuase it was a work accident, they won&#039;t pay for it or after you get tons of treatment they have a right to not pay and your stuck with the bills. We pay money into insurance so were protected, so if your one of those that bashes people for filing work comp claims or anything else that we have a RIGHT and Obligation to then you&#039;re just a complete fool. When you get it you do, then you can be a moron and pay out of your pocket if that makes you feel good, but let me tell you nobody gives a damn about you (insurance companies and your employer) so don&#039;t think your being a company guy by not ---behind the scenes they really think your foolish. Remember we, me, and you come first stop worrying about large companies that rob you blind and don&#039;t care anything about you. I for the life of me can&#039;t understand where people like you Earl come from. Pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earl, get your head out of your #*$, the majority of injury claims are legit, but since people have and many people have filed fraudelant claims you speak as though most everyone does. Let me tell you something, I ve filed 3 legit work comp cases over the past 12 yrs and I ve been followed and never did they catch me doing anything because I was legit, but its not a cool feeling to know you&#8217;re being watched and then try to explain to your kids that its ok and they don&#8217;t need to worry that a stranger is following us. Another thing Earl, I tell everyone I know that if they sustain an injury at work they better file a work comp claim otherwise they will most likely get screwed with their personal insurance, becuase it was a work accident, they won&#8217;t pay for it or after you get tons of treatment they have a right to not pay and your stuck with the bills. We pay money into insurance so were protected, so if your one of those that bashes people for filing work comp claims or anything else that we have a RIGHT and Obligation to then you&#8217;re just a complete fool. When you get it you do, then you can be a moron and pay out of your pocket if that makes you feel good, but let me tell you nobody gives a damn about you (insurance companies and your employer) so don&#8217;t think your being a company guy by not &#8212;behind the scenes they really think your foolish. Remember we, me, and you come first stop worrying about large companies that rob you blind and don&#8217;t care anything about you. I for the life of me can&#8217;t understand where people like you Earl come from. Pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earl</title>
		<link>http://www.howtovanish.com/2009/08/avoid-private-investigators/comment-page-1/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtovanish.com/?p=224#comment-989</guid>
		<description>Here is a sugestion. 

DOnt make fraudlent claims and try being a productive member of society</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a sugestion. </p>
<p>DOnt make fraudlent claims and try being a productive member of society</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie</title>
		<link>http://www.howtovanish.com/2009/08/avoid-private-investigators/comment-page-1/#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 19:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtovanish.com/?p=224#comment-957</guid>
		<description>How about this little question. Could you not technically be used as a pawn to test the new &quot;surveillance&quot; capabilities of @meric@? It is so very easy to spread disinformation today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about this little question. Could you not technically be used as a pawn to test the new &#8220;surveillance&#8221; capabilities of @meric@? It is so very easy to spread disinformation today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.howtovanish.com/2009/08/avoid-private-investigators/comment-page-1/#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 05:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtovanish.com/?p=224#comment-785</guid>
		<description>Great article Bill and great tip as well Joseph!
Keep up the fantastic work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Bill and great tip as well Joseph!<br />
Keep up the fantastic work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Rounds J.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.howtovanish.com/2009/08/avoid-private-investigators/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Rounds J.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 00:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtovanish.com/?p=224#comment-286</guid>
		<description>That is a good example of selectively using certain techniques.  Not everything that you do has to be concealed and leaving certain things publicly available can actually be beneficial.  Great comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a good example of selectively using certain techniques.  Not everything that you do has to be concealed and leaving certain things publicly available can actually be beneficial.  Great comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.howtovanish.com/2009/08/avoid-private-investigators/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 15:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtovanish.com/?p=224#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Here is a technique used by me for years.  Use a phone card to make all of your calls that you do not want traced.  When they try to determine what number the call came from all they will find is an 800 number for the phone card source.  There are a few &quot;phone card&quot; companies on the internet you can access.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a technique used by me for years.  Use a phone card to make all of your calls that you do not want traced.  When they try to determine what number the call came from all they will find is an 800 number for the phone card source.  There are a few &#8220;phone card&#8221; companies on the internet you can access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

